Popular Culture in Linguistic Perspective (selected issues)
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Huntington's disease in popular culture: a brief historical perspective.
In Ruth Rendell’s 1988 London mystery House of Stairs, the narrator suggests a startling sea change in the world of Huntington’s disease (HD). “The newspapers and television and magazines have been full of Huntington’s lately,” she observes. “Huntington’s has become a fashionable disease, displacing multiple sclerosis and even schizophrenia in the public’s curiosity.” [1]. She refers, no doubt,...
متن کاملPragmatic expressions in cross-linguistic perspective
This paper focuses on some pragmatic expressions that are characteristic of informal spoken English, their possible equivalents in some other languages, and their use by EFL learners from different backgrounds. These expressions, called general extenders (e.g. and stuff, or something), are shown to be different from discourse markers and to exhibit variation in form, funct...
متن کاملMyths of Popular Culture
The aim of this article is to explore some critical moments in the formation of ‘popular’ culture studies. This objective is not exhaustive, cannot be exhaustive in the space of a single article, since popular cultural studies have grown into an academic industry which not even five live-times of academic work by any individual can exhaust! This article is therefore, a rapid but hopefully, prov...
متن کاملIssues In Linguistic Segmentation
This paper addresses discourse structure from the perspective of understanding. It would perhaps help us understand the na,ture of discourse relatiolls il" we better understood what units of a text. can be related to one a.nother. In Olle ma.jor theory of discourse structure, Rhetorical Structure Theory (Mann &: Thompson 1988; Imrea.l'ter simply RS'T), the smallest possible linguistic units tha...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Artes Humanae
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2449-6340
DOI: 10.17951/arte.2016.1.0.97